7 Apr 2010,Silver Spring, Maryland, United States…Mark A. Kellner, Adventist Review/AN
A dramatic plan to remake Griggs University and Griggs International Academy, the 101-year-old distance learning arm of the Seventh-day Adventist Church, took its first steps April 6, when delegates to the Spring meeting of the world church’s Executive Committee accepted a report calling for a restructuring.
Among the seven major recommendations made by a study panel appointed at the 2009 Annual Council are plans to move Griggs and its undergraduate and graduate college degrees to another location, possibly to Andrews University in Berrien Springs, Michigan. There, Griggs would operate as a school underAndrews’ administration, with its own dean. It would no longer have a president and a board of trustees, though a board of advisors might be put in place.
The kindergarten through 12th grade correspondence school programs of Griggs, which began life in 1909 as “Home Study International,” would be spun off to the North American educational unit.
No decision was made on implementing the suggestions, whichwill require further study by world church leadership as well as leaders at Andrews University, whose president, Niels-Erik Andreasen wasnot part of the study panel. The earliest a further move would be officially contemplated would be the fall 2010 Annual Council, church executives said.
“This is a major move that we are making,” said Pastor Jan Paulsen, president of the Adventist world church and himself aveteran Adventist educator. “If the direction is set … Griggs as we know it today will cease to exist.”
The present configuration of Griggs, Paulsen noted, “is not a good model for the future.”
Alongwith these changes to Griggs’ orientation, the committee made three other recommendations:
-The new distance learning entity would “retain the current distance modality programs of Griggs and Andrews; create new academic and informal program options in response to the needs of the World Church and available resources; and engage new partners by articulation agreements.”
-The report called on administration to “create a central core faculty (teachers) and staff; and provide and require for them specific training, including integration of faith and learning, for the various distance delivery modalities; [and] share teachers with [Seventh-day Adventist] institutions throughout the world fields as possible.”
-And, “establish a system for continuous assessment and evaluation drawing on regional accreditation from [Andrews University] (and partners), [the Distance Education and Training Council, a private organization] for usewith nontraditional and emergency affiliation services, [and the Adventist Accrediting Association] for the assurance of Adventist beliefs and ethos, all of which require self-assessment as part of regular operations.”
“We have expert faculty in every discipline,but they are spread around the world,” study committee chairwoman Dr. Ella Smith Simmons, a general vice president of the world church, told delegates. “Through distance learning modalities we can access these faculty wherever they are and make them available to programs where the need is.”
Dr. Donald R. Sahly, Griggs president and a veteran Seventh-day Adventist educational administrator, said the report “supports the need for distance education” in the Seventh-day Adventist Church as well as “Griggs’ mission to the world church.”
The goalof any proposed changes, he said, would be to “strengthen Griggs’ position to serve students both in and out of the church, on a national and international basis.”
In discussion, Spring Meeting delegatesagreed that there was a need to do something to strengthen distance-based Adventist education. Dr. Richard Hart, president of Loma Linda University, said the same factors troubling Griggs were “impactingother institutions” in North America, and urged the study group to workwith the division-based Adventist Digital Education Consortium, a suggestion Simmons agreed with.
Andrews University president Andreasen said his institution will need some time to digest the recommendations as well.
“We are hearing [these ideas] for almostthe first time,” Andreasen told the meeting. “We need to take some time[to do our own] due diligence,” he added, which would involve evaluating the ideas relative to the university’s own “mission, resources, [the] financial end, [and our] accreditation — these are key. Issues that require some work and some time.”
Recalling the value of Seventh-day Adventist medical work in many communities, Paulsensaid there were issues beyond the church’s own educational needs to consider.
“We have a good tradition in this church … that we have a commitment of engagement into the lives of the communities and nations in which we are placed. We are engaged, in a sense, in a type ofcommunity building,” Paulsen said.
“The church, through an instrument such as this, may be seen as really a good partner in building the community. There are byproducts of this that might serve the church extremely well. There is a good name to be obtained [and] that should not be overlooked.”
