October 8, 2026 | Silver Spring, Maryland, United States | Alberto R. Timm

Dispensationalism is a system of biblical interpretation that divides human history into several distinct eras, or dispensations (usually seven). Each dispensation begins with a new revelation from God intended for a particular generation. Those who receive that revelation are judged according to it, but they ultimately fail to remain faithful, leading to the inauguration of a new dispensation that replaces the previous one. Dispensationalists place strong emphasis on the nation of Israel, viewing it as the eschatological focal point of God’s final plan for the world.

Several helpful critiques have been offered in response to the dispensationalist postulates.[1] This brief article highlights only some of Ellen White’s responses to the attempt to divide human history into contrasting dispensations, the notion of distinct revelations (or gospels), and the suggestion of an enduring distinction between Israel and the church.

[Photo: Brody Childs / Unsplash]

Bible Dispensations

The Scofield Reference Bible (1909, revised 1917) popularized the concept of seven distinct dispensations: Innocence (Gen. 1:28); Conscience (Gen. 3:23); Human Government (Gen. 8:20); Promise (Gen. 12:1); Law (Ex. 19:8); Grace (John 1:17); and Kingdom (Eph. 1:10).[2] Such a dichotomous rereading of the Bible artificially separated law and grace, confining law (apart from grace) to the dispensation of the Law, and grace (apart from law) to the dispensation of Grace.

By contrast, Ellen White spoke only of two main dispensations—the Old Testament and the New Testament—and viewed them as connected through a typological relationship.[3] For example, in 1882 she stated, “There is no such contrast as is often claimed to exist between the Old and the New Testament, the law of God and the gospel of Christ, the requirements of the Jewish and those of the Christian dispensation. Every soul saved in the former dispensation was saved by Christ as verily as we are saved by Him today. Patriarchs and prophets were Christians. The gospel promise was given to the first pair in Eden, when they had by transgression separated themselves from God. The gospel was preached to Abraham. The Hebrews all drank of that spiritual Rock, which was Christ.”[4]

Recognizing that God’s saving grace permeates the entire Old Testament, Ellen White wrote in 1886, “In the sacrificial offering on every altar was seen a Redeemer. With the cloud of incense arose from every contrite heart the prayer that God would accept their offerings as showing faith in the coming Saviour.”[5] A decade later, in 1896, she further affirmed the essential unity of Scripture by declaring, “The Old Testament is the gospel in figures and symbols. The New Testament is the substance. One is as essential as the other.”[6]

These statements underscore the essential continuity between the Old and New Testaments, emphasizing that the same gospel, the same Savior, and the same means of salvation operated throughout both dispensations. Consequently, the Old Testament anticipated in types, symbols, and promises what the New Testament more fully revealed in the person and work of Christ.

The Everlasting Gospel

The Scofield Reference Bible suggested the existence of four distinct forms of the gospel: the gospel of the kingdom, the gospel of the grace of God, the “everlasting gospel” (Rev. 14:6), and what Paul calls “my gospel” (Rom. 2:16). Regarding the “everlasting gospel” of Revelation 14:6, the Scofield Bible asserts that “it is neither the gospel of the kingdom, nor of grace,” but rather the message that will be proclaimed to Israel and to those who will be saved during the future tribulation.[7]

By contrast, Ellen White understood the everlasting gospel to be the same gospel proclaimed from the very beginning. Referring to Revelation 14:6, she described it as “the same gospel that was declared in Eden when God said to the serpent, ‘I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel’ (Gen. 3:15).”[8] In harmony with the declaration of Revelation 14:6 that the everlasting gospel is to be preached “to those who dwell on the earth—to every nation, tribe, tongue, and people,” Ellen White emphasized its present and universal proclamation rather than restricting it to a future ethnic group during a postulated tribulation period.[9]

Israel and the Church

Classical dispensationalist authors have strongly emphasized the distinction between Israel and the church. For example, Charles Ryrie argued that the essence of dispensationalism is not the number of dispensations but rather “the distinction between Israel and the church.”[10]

Daniel P. Fuller likewise observed that “the basic premise of Dispensationalism is two purposes of God expressed in the formation of two peoples who maintain their distinction throughout eternity.”[11] While progressive dispensationalists have retained a distinction between Israel and the church, they have significantly softened its expression and placed far less emphasis on the notion of two permanently distinct peoples of God.

Ellen White stressed the importance of reaching the Jewish people with the everlasting gospel,[12] but she did not regard the nation of Israel as having a distinct prophetic role in end-time events. Rather, she viewed the faithful of all ages—before and after Christ—as one covenant people of God, united by the same Savior, the same gospel, and the same plan of salvation. While she recognized the historical significance of ancient Israel, she did not distinguish Israel and the church as two separate peoples of God with distinct eternal destinies (Rom. 10:12; Gal. 3:28). Instead she saw the Christian church as the continuation and fulfillment of God’s covenant community, composed of all who place their faith in Christ.

Thus we can see a significant contrast between dispensationalism and Ellen White’s theological perspective. The continuity she perceived between the Old and New Testaments stands in sharp contrast to interpretations that separate law from grace or regard the Old Testament as fundamentally different from the New Testament in its plan of salvation. For Ellen White, both Testaments reveal the same gospel centered on Christ, with the Old Testament anticipating in types, symbols, and promises what the New Testament more fully reveals. She also understood the everlasting gospel to be eternal in the sense that it encompasses the entire history of salvation, rather than being limited to a future end-time proclamation. Furthermore, she recognized no present or future ethnic distinctions among God’s people, affirming instead the unity of all believers in Christ. Therefore, her understanding of salvation history, the everlasting gospel, and the people of God differs markedly from the central tenets of classical dispensationalism.

[1] George E. Ladd, The Blessed Hope (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans, 1956); Hans K. LaRondelle, The Israel of God in Prophecy (Berrien Springs, Mich.: Andrews University Press, 1983); Steve Wohlberg, End Time Delusions (Shippensburg, Pa.: Treasure House, 2004).

[2] The Scofield Reference Bible, new and improved ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1917), pp. 5 (n. 5), 10 (n. 2).

[3] Although Ellen White used the language of “dispensations,” she did not employ the term in the technical sense associated with later classical dispensationalism.

[4] Ellen G. White, “Obedience Better Than Sacrifice,” Signs of the Times, Sept. 14, 1882, p. 409.

[5] Ellen G. White, “The Two Dispensations,” Review and Herald, Mar. 2, 1886, p. 129.

[6] Ellen G. White, Selected Messages, book 2 (Washington, D.C.: Review and Herald Pub. Assn., 1958, 1980), p. 104.

[7] The Scofield Reference Bible, p. 1343 (n. 1).

[8] E. G. White, Selected Messages, book 2, p. 106.

[9] Ellen G. White, The Three Angels’ Messages (Silver Spring, Md: Review and Herald Pub. Assn., 2022), pp. 52-54.

[10] Charles C. Ryrie, Dispensationalism, revised and expanded ed. (Chicago: Moody Press, 1995), pp. 32-35.

[11] Daniel P. Fuller, “The Hermeneutics of Dispensationalism” (ThD diss., Northern Baptist Theological Seminary, 1957), p. 25.

[12] Ellen G. White, “The Work Among the Jews” (2018), https://media4.egwwritings.org/pdf/en_PH114.pdf.